Contenuto dell'articolo principale

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Mucositis is a frequent side-effect of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Assessment of oral cavity is important to detect alterations in the mouth and plan appropriate interventions. A reliable tool can help to have a better assessment of mucositis and a major knowledge about this phenomenon. Since no valid and reliable tool for the assessment of mucositis is still available in Italy, the aim of this study was to establish the validity and reliability of the Italian version of the Oral Assessment Guide (OAG). A panel of health care experts established the content validity of the tool both for the items and the descriptors. To establish the reliability of the tool, a sample of 14 inpatients with haematological diseases were recruited. Couples of dental hygienists separately performed 60 pairs of assessments (for a total of 120 assessments) on the sample. The Italian version of OAG was found to have an acceptable Content Validity Index (CVI) for items and related descriptors ranging between 0.67 and 1. Cronbach's alpha was 0.84, agreement of assessment ranged between 0.87 and 0.65 with Cohen's Kappa coefficient ranging from good to very good. This study showed that the Italian version of the OAG has good psychometric properties of validity and reliability to assess mucositis in patients undergoing chemotherapy. This tool will have a great importance to carry out future research in Italy aimed to improve the patient's outcomes particularly in terms of functional ability and quality of life. Parole Chiave: Mucositis, Oral Assessment Guide, Oral health, Chemotherapy, Validity and Reliability

RIASSUNTO

Le mucositi sono un frequente effetto indesiderato della chemio e radioterapia. La valutazione della cavití  orale è importante per rilevare alterazioni e pianificare interventi. Un valido strumento è indispensabile per valutare le mucositi in modo attendibile ed aumentare le nostre conoscenze sul fenomeno. In Italia al momento non è disponibile nessuno strumento valido ed affidabile per la valutazione delle mucositi. Lo scopo del presente studio è stato quello di stabilire la validití  e l'affidabilití  delle versione italiana dell'Oral Assessment Guide (OAG). Un gruppo di esperti ha stabilito la validití  di contenuto della strumento sia in riferimento agli item sia ai singoli descrittori. Per stabilire l'affidabilití  dello strumento è stato arruolato un campione di 14 pazienti ematologici sottoposti a chemioterapia sul quale coppie di igienisti dentali, in modo indipendente, hanno effettuato 60 coppie di valutazione (per un totale di 120). La versione italiana dell'OAG ha dimostrato di possedere una buona validití  di contenuto (CVI) sia per gli item che per i descrittori con un range di variabilití  compreso tra 0,67 e 1. L'alfa di Cronbach è risultato di 0,84, la concordanza delle valutazione è risultata compresa tra 0,87 e 0,65 con un Kappa di Cohen compreso tra buono e molto buono. Questo studio ha mostrato che la versione italiana dell'OAG possiede buone proprietí  psicometriche. Il suo utilizzo potrebbe risultare importante per future ricerche in Italia aventi lo scopo di migliorare gli outcomes dei pazienti, con particolare riferimento alle abilití  funzionale e alla qualití  della vita.

Key words: Mucosite, Oral Assessment Guide, Salute orale, Chemioterapia, Validití  e Affidabilití .

Dettagli dell'articolo

Come citare
D’Angelo, D., Vellone, E., Salvatori, C., De Marinis, M. G., & Alvaro, R. (2013). Validity and reliability of the Italian version of the oral assessment guide. PROFESSIONI INFERMIERISTICHE, 66(2). Recuperato da https://www.profinf.net/pro3/index.php/IN/article/view/27

Riferimenti

  • Alterio, D., Jereczek-Fossa, B. A., Fiore, M. R., Piperno, G., Ansarin, M., Orecchia, R. (2007). Cancer treatment induced oral mucositis. Anticancer research 27, 1105-1125.
  • Anderson, P., Hallberg, I. R., Renvert, S. (2002). Inter-rater reliability of an oral assessment guide for elderly patients residing in a rehabilitation ward. Special care in dentistry 22, 181-186.
  • Andersson, P., Persson, L., Hallberg, I. R., Renvert, S. (1999). Testing an oral assessment guide during chemotherapy treatment in a Swedish care setting: a pilot study. Clinical journal of oncology nursing 8, 150-158.
  • Bernardi, M.T., Zanotti, R. (2010) Dental evaluation in the disabled: case-control study. Prof Inferm 63, 239-249.
  • Borowski, B., Benhamou, E., Pico, J. L., Laplanche, A., Margainaud, J. P., Haya, M. (1994). Prevention of oral mucositis in patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation: a randomised controlled trial comparing two protocols of dental care. European journal of cancer. Part B, Oral oncology 30B, 93-97.
  • Castaño. F., Sánchez, R., Chicano, R., Merino, C. (2005). Measurement of secondary mucositis to oncohematologic treatment by means of different scale. Medicina oral, patologí­a oral y cirugí­a bucal 10, 412-421.
  • Catania G., 2007 Gestione del paziente con mucosite. Dossier InFad 2, 1-9. Data accesso 13 Giugno, 2010, da http://www.thinktag.org/documentstore/mucosite _infad_4.pdf.
  • Cella, D., Pulliam, J., Fuchs, H. (2003). Evaluation of pain associated with oral mucositis during the acute period after administration of high-dose chemotherapy. Cancer 98, 406-412.
  • Cheng, K. K., Molassiotis, A., Chang, A. M., Wai, W. C., Cheung, S. S. (2001). Evaluation of an oral care protocol intervention in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis in paediatric cancer patients. European journal of cancer 37, 2056–2063.
  • D'Angelo, D., Mastroianni, C., Vellone, E., Alvaro, R., Casale, G., Latina, R., De Marinis, M.G. (2012). Palliative care quality indicators in Italy. What do we evaluate?. Supportive Care in Cancer 20, 1983-1989.
  • D'Angelo, D., Mastroianni, C., Vellone, E., Alvaro, R., Casale, G., Lucarelli, S., Latina, R., Matarese, M., De Marinis, M.G. (2013). Transitions between care settings after enrolment in a palliative care service in Italy: a retrospective analysis. International Journal of Palliative Nursing 19, 110-115.
  • Djuric, M., Hillier, K. V., Belic A., Jankovic, L. (2006). Mucositis prevention by improved dental care in acute leukaemia patients. Supportive Care in Cancer 14, 137-146.
  • Duncan, M., Grant, G. (2003). Oral and intestinal mucositis - causes and possible treatments. Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics 18, 853-874.
  • Eilers, J., Epstein, J. B. (2004). Assessment and measurement of oral mucositis. Seminars in oncology nursing 20, 22-29.
  • Eilers, J., Million R. (2007). Prevention and management of oral mucositis in patients with cancer. Seminars in oncology nursing 23, 201-212.
  • Eilers, J., Berger, A.M., Petersen, M.C. (1988). Development, testing, and application of the oral assessment guide. Oncology nursing forum 15, 325-330.
  • Gibson, F., Cargill, J., Allison, J., Begent, J., Cole, S., Stone, J., Lucas, V. (2006). Establishing content validity of the oral assessment guide in children and young people. European journal of cancer 42 (12), 1817-1825.
  • Glenny, A.M., Gibson, F., Auld, E., Coulson, S., Clarkson, J.E., Craig, J.V., Eden, O.B., Khalid, T., Worthington, H.V., Pizer, B. (2010). The development of evidence-based guidelines on mouth care for children, teenagers and young adults treated for cancer. European journal of cancer 46 (8), 1399-412.
  • Graham, K.M., Pecoraro, D.A., Ventura, M., Meyer, C.C. (1993). Reducing the incidence of stomatitis using a quality assessment and improvement approach. Cancer nursing 16, 117-122.
  • Harris, D.J., Eilers, J., Harriman, A., Cashavelly, B.J., Maxwell, C. (2008). Putting evidence into practice: evidence-based interventions for the management of oral mucositis. Clinical journal of oncology nursing 12, 141-152.
  • Jaroneski, L.A. (2006). The importance of assessment rating scales for chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis. Oncol nursing forum 33, 1085-1090.
  • Keefe, D.M., Schubert, M.M., Elting, L.S., Sonis, S.T., Epstein, J.B., Raber-Durlacher, J.E., Migliorati, C.A., McGuire, D.B., Hutchins, R.D., Peterson, D.E. (2007). Updated clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and treatment of mucositis. Cancer 109 (5), 820-831.
  • Kní¶í¶s, M., Ostman, M. (2010). Oral Assessment Guide--test of reliability and validity for patients receiving radiotherapy to the head and neck region. European journal of cancer care (Engl)19, 53-60.
  • Landis, R.J., Koch, G.G. (1997). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33, 159-174.
  • Lindhe, J., Karring, T., Lang, N.P. (2006). Paradontologia clinica e odontoiatria impiantare, third ed Ermes, Milano.
  • Lynn, M.R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research 35, 382-385.
  • Longo, M., Rinaldi, M., Pacifico, C., Roppo, N., Dodaro, S., Lisco, A. (2008). Quality of nursing care and assessment: preliminary results of a study performed at the IRCCS "Giovanni Paolo II" Cancer Institute, Bari. Prof Inferm 61, 14-20.
  • Mark, W., Stanton, M.A. (2005). Hospital nurse staffing and quality of care. Prof Inferm 58, 76-74.
  • Niscola, P., Romani, C., Cupelli, L., Scaramucci, L., Tendas, A., Dentamaro, T., Amadori, S., de Fabritiis, P. (2007). Mucositis in patients with hematologic malignancies: an overview. Haematologica 92, 222-231.
  • Orlando, L., Piredda, A., Ritella, M. (2008). Prevenzione delle infezioni del cavo orale. Haematology meeting reports 2, 100-105
  • Parulekar, W., Mackenzie, R., Bjarnason, G., Jordan, R.C. (1998). Scoring oral mucositis. Oral oncology 34, 63-71.
  • Polit, D.F., Beck, C.T. (2006). The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in nursing & health 29, 489-497.
  • Potting, C.M., Blijlevens, N.A., Donnelly, J.P., Feuth, T., Van Achterberg, T.A. (2006). A scoring system for the assessment of oral mucositis in daily nursing practice. European journal of cancer care (Engl) 15, 228-234.
  • Sadler, G.R., Stoudt, A., Fullerton, J.T., Oberle-Edwards, L.K., Nguyen, Q., Epstein, J.B. (2003). Managing the oral sequelae of cancer therapy. Medsurg nursing 12, 28-36.
  • Sili, A., Vellone, E., De Marinis, M.G., Fida, R., Venturini, G., Alvaro, R. (2010). Validity and reliability of the nursing organizational health questionnaire. Prof Inferm 63, 27-37.
  • Silverman, S. (2007). Diagnosis and management of oral mucositis. The journal of supportive oncology 5, 13-21.
  • Sitzia, J., Dikken, C., Hughes, J.(1997). Psychometric evaluation of a questionnaire to document side effects of chemotherapy. Journal of advanced nursing 25, 999-1007.
  • Sonis, S.T., Eilers, J.P., Epstein, J.B., LeVeque, F.G., Liggett, W.H. Jr., Mulagha, M.T., Peterson, D.E., Rose, A.H., Schubert, M.M., Spijkervet, F.K., Wittes, J.P. (1999). Validation of a new scoring system for the assessment of clinical trial research of oral mucositis induced by radiation or chemotherapy. Cancer 85 (10), 2103-2113.
  • Sonis, S.T., Elting, L.S., Keefe, D. (2004). Perspective on cancer therapy induced mucosal injury. Cancer 100, 1995-2025.
  • Trotti, A., Byhardt, R., Stetz, J., Gwede, C., Corn, B., Fu, K., Gunderson, L., McCormick, B., Morrisintegral, M., Rich, T., Shipley, W., Curran, W. (2000). Common toxicity criteria: version 2.0. an improved reference for grading the acute effects of cancer treatment: impact on radiotherapy. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics 47 (1), 13-47.
  • Van Gerpen, R. (2003). Stomatitis. Clinical journal of oncology nursing 7, 471-474.
  • Wojtaszek, C. (2000). Management of chemotherapy-induced stomatitis. Clinical journal of oncology nursing 4, 263-270.
  • World Health Organization. (1979). WHO handbook for reporting results of cancer treatment. World Health Organization, Geneva.