Barra laterale dell'articolo

Scarica
Abbonamento o quota di accesso PDF (EUR 5)
Statistica
Leggi contatore : 1003 Scarica : 9

Contenuto dell'articolo principale

Abstract

Scopo. Esplorare il livello di soddisfazione e l'esperienza di apprendimento clinico degli studenti in Ostetricia del primo anno di corso dopo il primo tirocinio clinico; analizzare l'associazione tra motivazione individuale e soddisfazione complessiva degli studenti.

Metodo. Lo studio, trasversale multicentrico, è stato condotto in quattro sedi universitarie italiane del Corso di Laurea in Ostetricia. Un campione di convenienza di 61 studenti ha compilato la versione italiana del questionario "Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and plus Nurse Teacher (CLES+T) scale" al termine del primo tirocinio clinico.

Risultati. I punteggi medi assegnati alle dimensioni della scala variano da 3.53 (clima di apprendimento) a 3.08 (relazione di tutorato). Gli studenti (68.9%) sono complessivamente soddisfatti della propria esperienza di tirocinio. Rispetto alla motivazione individuale, 27 studenti (44.3%) erano motivati all'inizio del tirocinio e 31 studenti (50.8%) altamente motivati. Coloro che hanno dichiarato di essere maggiormente motivati all'inizio del tirocinio manifestano anche un livello di soddisfazione superiore (χ2=11.712, p=0.019).

Conclusioni. I risultati di questo studio contribuiscono ad ampliare le conoscenze sulla prima esperienza di tirocinio clinico degli studenti in Ostetricia. Inoltre, i risultati hanno evidenziato un'associazione tra motivazione iniziale degli studenti e soddisfazione che dovrebbe essere approfondita attraverso ulteriori studi multicentrici.

Parole chiave: ostetriche, ambiente di apprendimento clinico, tirocinio clinico, soddisfazione

Midwifery students' satisfaction and perception of their first clinical placement: multicentre observational study

Aim. To explore the first year midwifery students' clinical learning experience and satisfaction; to analyse the association between students' satisfaction and individual motivation.

Method. The multicentre cross-sectional study was carried out in four Italian midwifery degree courses. A convenience sample of 61 students filled out the Italian version of the "Clinical Learning Environment and Supervision plus Nurse Teacher (CLES+T) scale" after the conclusion of their first clinical placement.

Results. The mean values of the main sub-dimensions of CLES+T varied from 3.53 (pedagogical atmosphere) to 3.08 (supervisory relationship). Students (68.9%) were mainly satisfied with their clinical placement. With regard to individual motivation, 27 students (44.3%) were motivated at the beginning of the clinical placement, and 31 students (50.8%) were highly motivated. Highly motivated students showed higher satisfaction levels (χ2 = 11,712, p = 0.019).

Conclusions. The findings expand knowledge on the first year midwifery students' clinical learning experience Moreover, the results showed an association between initial student motivation and satisfaction that should be investigated through further multicenter studies.

Keywords: midwifery, clinical learning environment, clinical placement, personal satisfaction.

Dettagli dell'articolo

Come citare
Comparcini, D., Tomietto, M., Simonetti, V., Zambri, F., & Cicolini, G. (2016). Percezione e soddisfazione degli studenti in Ostetricia al primo anno di tirocinio clinico: studio osservazionale multicentrico. PROFESSIONI INFERMIERISTICHE, 69(2). Recuperato da https://www.profinf.net/pro3/index.php/IN/article/view/246
Scarica citazione
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

Riferimenti

  • Abraham, R., Ramnarayan, K., Vinad, P., & Tork, S. (2008). Students' preceptions of learning environment in an Indian medical school. BMC Medical Education, 8(20), 1-5.
  • Al-Hazimi, A., Zaini, R., Al-Hyiani, A., Hassan, N., Gunaid, A., Ponnamperuma, G., Karunathilake, I., Roff, S., McAleer, S., & Davis, M. (2004). Educational environment in traditional and innovative medical schools: a study in four undergraduate medical schools. Education for Health, 2(17), 192-203.
  • Avalos, G., Freeman, C., & Dunne, F. (2007). Determining the quality of medical educational environment at an Irish Medical school using the DREEM inventory. Irish Medical Journal, 100(7), 522-525.
  • Bakshialiabad, H., Bakhshi, M., & Gholamhossein, H. (2015). Students' perceptions of the academic learning environment in seven medical sciences courses based on DREEM. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 6, 195-203.
  • Berjan, M., & Hertel, F. (2013). Evaluating students' perception of their clinical placements - testing the clinical learning environment and supervision and nurse teacher scale (CLES + T scale) in Germany. Nurse Education Today, 33(11), 1393-1398.
  • Carter, A. G., Creedy, D. K., & Sidebothram, M. (2015). Evaluation of tools used to measure critical thinking development in nursing and midwifery undergraduate students: a systematic review. Nurse Education Today, 35(7), 864-874.
  • Chan, D. (2001). Development of an innovative tool to assess hospital learning environments. Nurse Education Today, 21(8), 624-631.
  • Chan, D. (2002). Associations between student learning outcomes from their clinical placement and their perceptions of the social climate of the clinical learning environment. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 39(5), 517-524.
  • Chan, D. (2003). Validation of the Clinical learning Environment Inventory. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 25(5), 519-532.
  • Chan, D., & Ip, W. Y. (2007). Perception of hospital learning environment: a survey of Hong Kong nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 27(7), 677-684.
  • Cicolini, G., Comparcini, D., & Simonetti, V. (2013). Workplace empowerment and nurses' job satisfaction: a systematic literature review. Journal of Nursing Management, 22(7), 855-871.
  • Comparcini, D., Simonetti, V., Tomietto, M., Galli, F., Fiorani, C., Di Labio, L., & Cicolini, G. (2014). Percezione degli ambienti di tirocinio e soddisfazione degli studenti infermieri nel primo tirocinio clinico: studio osservazionale. Professioni Infermieristiche, 67(1), 41-47.
  • Cooper, J., Courtney Pratt, H., & Fitzgerald, M. (2015). Key influences identified by first year undergraduate nursing students as impacting on the quality of clinical placement: a qualitative study. Nurse Education Today, 35(9), 1004-1008.
  • Duchscher, J. E. (2009). Transition shock: the initial stage of role adaptation for newly graduated registered nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65(5), 1103-1113.
  • Dunn, S.V., & Burnett, P. (1995). The development of a clinical learning environment scale. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 22(6), 1166-1173.
  • Gustafsson, M., Blomberg, K., & Holmefur, M. (2015). Test-retest reliability of the Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher (CLES + T) scale. Nurse Education in Practice, 15(4), 253-257.
  • Heidari, M. R., & Norouzadeh, R. (2015). Nursing students' perspectives on clinical education. Journal of Advances Medical Education and Professionalism, 3(1), 39-43.
  • Henriksen, N., Normann, H. K., & Skaalvik, M. W. (2012). Development and testing of the Norwegian version of the Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher (CLES+T) evaluation scale. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 9(1). doi: 10.1515/1548-923X.2239
  • Hosoda, Y. (2006). Development and testing of a Clinical Learning Environment Diagnostic Inventory for baccalaureate nursing students. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 56(5), 480-490.
  • Kaphagawani, N. C., & Useh, U. (2013). Analysis of Nursing Students Learning Experiences in Clinical Practice: Literature Review. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 7(3), 181-185.
  • Kermansaravi, F., Navidian, A., & Yaghoubinia F. (2015). Nursing students' views of nursing education quality: a qualitative study. Global Journal of Health Science, 7(2), 351-359.
  • Midgley, K. (2006). Pre-registration student nurses perception of the hospital-learning environment during clinical placement. Nurse Education Today, 26(4), 338-345.
  • Papastavrou, E., Dimitriadou, M., & Tsangari, H. (2015). Psychometric Testing of the Greek Version of the Clinical Learning Environment-Teacher (CLES+T). Global Journal of Health Science, 8(5), 59-71.
  • Papp, I., Markkanen, M., & Von Bonsdorff, M. (2003). Clinical environment as a learning environment: student nurses perceptions concerning clinical learning experiences. Nurse Education Today, 23(4), 262-268.
  • Roff, S. (2005). The Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM) – a generic instrument for measuring students' perceptions of undergraduate health professions curricula. Medical Teacher, 27(4), 322-325. doi: 10.1080/01421590500151054
  • Saarikoski, M., Leino-Kilpi, H., & Warne, T. (2002). Clinical learning environment and supervision: testing a research instrument in an international comparative study. Nurse Education Today, 22(4), 340-349.
  • Saarikoski, M., Isoaho, H., Warne, T., & Leino-Kilpi, H. (2008). The nurse teacher in clinical practice: developing the new sub-dimension to the Clinical Learning Environment and Supervision (CLES) Scale. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45(8), 1233-1237.
  • Sand-Jeclin, K. (2009). Assessing nursing student perceptions of the clinical learning environment: refinement and testing of the SECEE inventory. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 17(3), 232-246.
  • Sukanta, T., & Sharmila, D. (2013). Students' perception of the learning environment in a new medical college by means of the DREEM inventory. International Journal of Research Medical Sciences, 1(4), 385-391.
  • Taheri, M. (2009). Students' perceptions of learning environment in Guilan University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Medical Education, 13(4), 127-133.
  • Teamur, A., Mandana, S., Ideh, D., Hooman, S., & Amin, G. (2014). Health students' expectations of the ideal educational environment: a qualitative research. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism, 2(4), 151-157.
  • Tomietto, M., Saiani, L., Saarikoski, M., Fabris, S., Cunico, L., Campagna, V., & Palese, A. (2009). La valutazione della qualití degli ambienti di apprendimento clinico: studio di validazione del Clinical Learning Environment and Supervision (CLES) nel contesto italiano. Giornale Italiano di Medicina del Lavoro ed Ergonomia Supplemento B, Psicologia, 31(3), 49-55.
  • Tomietto, M., Saiani, L., Palese, A., Cunico, L., Cicolini, G., Watson, P., & Saarikoski, M. (2012). Clinical learning environment and supervision plus nurse teacher (CLES+T) scale: testing the psychometric characteristics of the Italian version. Giornale Italiano di Medicina del Lavoro ed Ergonomia Supplemento B, Psicologia, 34(2), 72-80.
  • Tomietto, M., Comparcini, D., Simonetti, V., Pelusi, G., Troiani, S., Saarikoski, M., & Cicolini, G. (2015). Work-engaged nurses for a better clinical learning environment: a ward-level analysis. Journal of Nursing Management, 24(4), 475-482. doi: 10.1111/ jonm.12346.
  • Vizcaya-Moreno, M.F., Pérez-Cañaveras, R.M., De Juan, J., & Saarikoski, M. (2015). Development and psychometric testing of the Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher evaluation scale (CLES+T): the Spanish version. Internation Journal of Nursing Studies, 52(1), 361-367.
  • Walsh, D. (2010). The Nurse Mentor's Handbook: Supporting Students in Clinical Practice. McGraw-Hill International: Open University Press.
  • Warne, T., Johansson, U. B., Papastavrou, E., Tichelaar, E., Tomietto, M., Van den Bossche, K., Moreno, M. F., & Saarikoski, M. (2010). An exploration of the clinical learning experiences of nursing students in nine European countries. Nurse Education Today, 30(8), 809-815.
  • Watson, P. B., Seaton, P., Sims, D., Jamieson, I., Mountier, J., Whittle, R., & Saarikoski, M. (2014). Exploratory factor analysis of the Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher Scale (CLES+T). Journal of Nursing Measurement, 22(1), 164-180.